=== FILE METADATA ===
Original: /home/solaya/Downloads/OFH/msgs/25-07-18- 3rd Installment-20250904T073823Z-1-001/25-07-18- 3rd Installment/Items_from_D._Kenny___22_/RE Redmond PSH Omnibus Financing Resolution (13).msg
Relative: 25-07-18- 3rd Installment-20250904T073823Z-1-001/25-07-18- 3rd Installment/Items_from_D._Kenny___22_/RE Redmond PSH Omnibus Financing Resolution (13).msg
Size: 134656 bytes
Modified: 2025-06-18 06:58:08
Hash: ea1dc1ad21ed3d7cf59c01e41bc92300
===================

From: Josey Ennis <jennis@kantortaylor.com>
To: "Daniel P. Kenny" <dpkenny@omwlaw.com>
Subject: RE: Redmond PSH: Omnibus Financing Resolution
Date: 2025-04-08 05:40:14-10:00

Hi Daniel,

 

The city of Redmond Regulatory Agreement references the Restrictive Covenant.  And the Operational Agreement is covered by the “documents required by RZC 21.57”, which I think was your requested language.

 

Thanks,

Josey

 

Josephine Klepack Ennis (she/her)
Associate



Kantor Taylor PC

206.812.2499| www.KantorTaylor.com <http://www.kantortaylor.com/> 

 

This statement is required by IRS regulations: The advice expressed in this email, if it is an opinion at all, is an opinion limited to the Federal tax issues addressed in it.  Additional issues may exist that could affect Federal tax treatment of the transaction or matter that is the subject of this advice, and the advice does not consider or provide a conclusion with respect to any additional issues. With respect to any significant Federal tax issues outside the limited scope of the advice provided, the advice cannot be used by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on that person.

 

From: Daniel P. Kenny <dpkenny@omwlaw.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2025 11:29 AM
To: Josey Ennis <jennis@kantortaylor.com>
Subject: RE: Redmond PSH: Omnibus Financing Resolution

 

Josey, 

 

Quick question – I am not seeing the City of Redmond restrictive covenant listed in Exhibit A. Within Other Documents I see “City of Redmond Regulatory Agreement” – is that supposed to be the City code required operating agreement (you do have “documents required by RZC 21.57”, which would cover this one), or is that supposed to be the restrictive covenant?  Perhaps the title of it should be changed to match the title of the draft document we are reviewing now (“Permanent Supportive Housing Restrictive Covenant”)?

 

Daniel P. Kenny  |  Attorney

 

Ogden Murphy Wallace P.L.L.C.

701 Fifth Ave. 

Suite 5600

Seattle, WA 98104-7045
Phone: 206.447.2258  |  Email: dpkenny@omwlaw.com <mailto:dpkenny@omwlaw.com> 

 

CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION - This communication constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 2510, and its disclosure is strictly limited to the recipient intended by the sender.  It may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, and/or confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of any of the contents is STRICTLY PROHIBITED.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original transmission and all copies.

 

 

From: Josey Ennis <jennis@kantortaylor.com <mailto:jennis@kantortaylor.com> > 
Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2025 6:37 AM
To: 'Jessica Weston' <jweston@gejlaw.com <mailto:jweston@gejlaw.com> >; 'DeSimone, Emily' <edesimone@enterprisecommunity.com <mailto:edesimone@enterprisecommunity.com> >; 'Mary Gaiser' <mgaiser@gejlaw.com <mailto:mgaiser@gejlaw.com> >; 'Alex Pace' <Alexander.Pace@heritagebanknw.com <mailto:Alexander.Pace@heritagebanknw.com> >; 'Kazmi, Rafay' <rkazmi@enterprisecommunity.com <mailto:rkazmi@enterprisecommunity.com> >; 'Grossman, Susan' <sgrossman@enterprisecommunity.com <mailto:sgrossman@enterprisecommunity.com> >; 'Pahl, Colin' <cpahl@enterprisecommunity.com <mailto:cpahl@enterprisecommunity.com> >; 'chris.graving@stokeslaw.com' <chris.graving@stokeslaw.com <mailto:chris.graving@stokeslaw.com> >; 'ben.werthan@stokeslaw.com' <ben.werthan@stokeslaw.com <mailto:ben.werthan@stokeslaw.com> >; 'tatyana.tunget@stokeslaw.com' <tatyana.tunget@stokeslaw.com <mailto:tatyana.tunget@stokeslaw.com> >; 'viktoryia.kastsenka@heritagebanknw.com' <viktoryia.kastsenka@heritagebanknw.com <mailto:viktoryia.kastsenka@heritagebanknw.com> >; Tippy, Patrick <PTippy@bellevuewa.gov <mailto:PTippy@bellevuewa.gov> >; ybender@bellevuewa.gov <mailto:ybender@bellevuewa.gov> ; Wendt, Brian <BWendt@bellevuewa.gov <mailto:BWendt@bellevuewa.gov> >; Daniel P. Kenny <dpkenny@omwlaw.com <mailto:dpkenny@omwlaw.com> >
Cc: Melanie Krebs <mkrebs@kantortaylor.com <mailto:mkrebs@kantortaylor.com> >; Andrea Sato <Asato@kantortaylor.com <mailto:Asato@kantortaylor.com> >; 'Elizabeth Murphy' <emurphy@plymouthhousing.org <mailto:emurphy@plymouthhousing.org> >; 'Karen Peterson' <kpeterson@plymouthhousing.org <mailto:kpeterson@plymouthhousing.org> >; 'Alaine Ziegenhagel' <aziegenhagel@plymouthhousing.org <mailto:aziegenhagel@plymouthhousing.org> >
Subject: RE: Redmond PSH: Omnibus Financing Resolution

 

Good morning,

 

Plymouth is taking their omnibus resolution to their April meeting, so we made some updates to the version circulated in March. The attached resolution incorporates all prior comments and will be approved by the Board on April 14th. Redlines against the prior version are attached.

 

Thank you,

Josey

 

Josephine Klepack Ennis (she/her)
Associate



Kantor Taylor PC

206.812.2499| www.KantorTaylor.com <http://www.kantortaylor.com/> 

 

This statement is required by IRS regulations: The advice expressed in this email, if it is an opinion at all, is an opinion limited to the Federal tax issues addressed in it.  Additional issues may exist that could affect Federal tax treatment of the transaction or matter that is the subject of this advice, and the advice does not consider or provide a conclusion with respect to any additional issues. With respect to any significant Federal tax issues outside the limited scope of the advice provided, the advice cannot be used by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on that person.

 

From: Josey Ennis 
Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 3:56 PM
To: Jessica Weston <jweston@gejlaw.com <mailto:jweston@gejlaw.com> >; Elizabeth Murphy <emurphy@plymouthhousing.org <mailto:emurphy@plymouthhousing.org> >; DeSimone, Emily <edesimone@enterprisecommunity.com <mailto:edesimone@enterprisecommunity.com> >; Mary Gaiser <mgaiser@gejlaw.com <mailto:mgaiser@gejlaw.com> >; Alex Pace <Alexander.Pace@heritagebanknw.com <mailto:Alexander.Pace@heritagebanknw.com> >; Kazmi, Rafay <rkazmi@enterprisecommunity.com <mailto:rkazmi@enterprisecommunity.com> >; Karen Peterson <kpeterson@plymouthhousing.org <mailto:kpeterson@plymouthhousing.org> >; Grossman, Susan <sgrossman@enterprisecommunity.com <mailto:sgrossman@enterprisecommunity.com> >; Alaine Ziegenhagel <aziegenhagel@plymouthhousing.org <mailto:aziegenhagel@plymouthhousing.org> >; Pahl, Colin <cpahl@enterprisecommunity.com <mailto:cpahl@enterprisecommunity.com> >; chris.graving@stokeslaw.com <mailto:chris.graving@stokeslaw.com> ; ben.werthan@stokeslaw.com <mailto:ben.werthan@stokeslaw.com> ; tatyana.tunget@stokeslaw.com <mailto:tatyana.tunget@stokeslaw.com> ; viktoryia.kastsenka@heritagebanknw.com <mailto:viktoryia.kastsenka@heritagebanknw.com> 
Cc: Melanie Krebs <mkrebs@kantortaylor.com <mailto:mkrebs@kantortaylor.com> >; Andrea Sato <asato@kantortaylor.com <mailto:asato@kantortaylor.com> >
Subject: Redmond PSH: Omnibus Financing Resolution

 

Good afternoon,

 

Attached for your review is a draft of the financing resolution for the Redmond PSH transaction. We are requesting your comments by EOD this Friday, March 7th, so that we can have a final resolution ready for the Board in time for their meeting on March 14th. Please note that this is being reviewed simultaneously by Plymouth and is subject to their comments.

 

Please let us know of any questions.

 

Thanks,

Josey

 

Josephine Klepack Ennis (she/her)
Associate



Kantor Taylor PC

206.812.2499| www.KantorTaylor.com <http://www.kantortaylor.com/> 

 

This statement is required by IRS regulations: The advice expressed in this email, if it is an opinion at all, is an opinion limited to the Federal tax issues addressed in it.  Additional issues may exist that could affect Federal tax treatment of the transaction or matter that is the subject of this advice, and the advice does not consider or provide a conclusion with respect to any additional issues. With respect to any significant Federal tax issues outside the limited scope of the advice provided, the advice cannot be used by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on that person.

 



--- Attachments ---
- image001.jpg
